Awaiting reviewer selection emerald journal I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). The study aims to present a systematic literature review (SLR) to understand the current status of research on social media usage among the bottom of the pyramid (BOP). Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same Rapid Prototyping Journal: Volume 28 Issue 11. Does this imply rejection? One possibility is that this journal shows the status “Awaiting reviewer selection” during the time that the editorial screening is going on. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Updates. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. As the Editor of the new journal China Agricultural Economic Review (CAER) I would like to take the privilege to say some words about the motivation of launching the journal and how it came to you. If you don’t see any change in the status for a few weeks, you could write to the journal, requesting for an It may be as simple as making the author and reviewers known to one another, or the reviews – and the reviewers’ names – may be published alongside the article. With their help, the journal has been able to publish such high-quality articles: My paper underwent a revision. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ happened earlier, they initially decided to send it for review, but changed their mind, and decided to This could be the editor-in-chief, the associate/managing editor if the journal has one, or simply the journal office. Your article may also be sent to relevant Associate Editor’s for internal review. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review Journals. Authors; Editors; Librarians; Researchers; The status changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting Ed decision" in a week's time. If there are permissions outstanding, please upload these when you submit your revision or send directly to Emerald if your paper is accepted immediately. Note, if the paper is outside the journal’s scope, the editor may reject it and suggest it is transferred to a more relevant Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. Stack Exchange Network. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access. e. The Action Editor The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Since the Brundtland report’s call for sustainability, planetary conditions have deteriorated. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? The progress has been staying in “Awaiting Referee Selection” for about two months; until today, it changes to “Awaiting Referee Invitation. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Search. 2. Citations offer an ‘unobtrusive’ quantitative An international multi-disciplinary journal for the dissemination of food-related research. The framework uses EKF to improve the accuracy of target detection and a robust motion prediction algorithm to reduce the impact of trajectory jitter. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Initially, the status was ''Awaiting Reviewer Scores'', then changed to ''Awaiting AE Recommendation'', and now it is ''Awaiting AE evaluation''. Reviewer feedback on the paper will be provided to the corresponding author. Article Type: Editorial From: China Agricultural Economic Review, Volume 1, Issue 1. Launched in 1999, the journal is open access and covers the spectrum of languages and cultures of contemporary Southeast Asian societies with high-quality theoretical, analytical, and empirical works. What does it mean if the status has been Awaiting Reviewer Scores for four weeks - and what should I do? What are the indicators of acceptance in highly trusted journals, and what does 'Awaiting reviewer scores' mean? Hope that helps. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" after a month. Strapline: The international journal for research on additive manufacturing and 3D printing. During reject and resubmit, I got I contacted the journal several times, but there was no reply. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. " Does this Managerial Auditing Journal: Volume 39 Issue 3. Among other reasons, this could be due to the field of study – perhaps it’s niche/super-specialized, interdisciplinary to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ recommendations The editor makes the final decision, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations The editor notifies the author that their paper has been accepted The editor notifies the author that their paper has been rejected and shares a copy As per my personal experience with IOP Journal(s), the status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control For your current submission, the status change you have described indicates that your manuscript had passed the admin check and the reviewer selection process had started. CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals. The status was displayed as ‘Accepted,’ but after that, it has been ‘Awaiting JEO Checking. Since 1998, the European Journal of Innovation Management (EJIM) has been a leading forum dedicated to thought leadership and research on the advances in innovation management. What does this mean? Does this mean that the AE changed his/her Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Reviewing for an Emerald journal entitles you to free personal access to up 40 Emerald journal articles (excluding backfiles). As per the status description, it seems that the manuscript's initial editorial screening is done and the editor is now looking for reviewers. 5 months with no change in status. We review those closely related to physics and others with novel features. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Further information. Given that EJIM has run over two decades, the time is now The final decision lies with the editor. I have previously published in the same journal This session will discuss how the journal peer-review process works and collect tips from our speaker to Thank you for your interest in joining this webinar. The current status is still awaiting reviewer invitation. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. This is usually because of a scope mismatch, or in some cases, the novelty and/or quality of the research/paper not being satisfactory. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Mental Health Review Journal; Mental Health and Digital Technologies; Mental Health and Social Inclusion; Mental Illness ; Microelectronics International; Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications; Multicultural Education & Technology Journal; Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures; Multinational Business Review; Nankai Business Review International; New I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Volume If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! A direct change after submission (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. The final decision - whether to accept or reject the paper - depends on the reviewer scores, which is why the status of your manuscript would have been updated to both "awaiting reviewer scores" and "awaiting final decision". It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. Here, the first change (from ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’) means that the AE received the peer reviewers’ comments and evaluations for the paper. We Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. All I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Issue 6 However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. A good compromise between precision and conciseness would arguably awaiting potential reviewer selection or awaiting editorial assessment, but there are also journals who call this just awaiting reviewer selection. I sincerely We are to pleased to announce our 2021 Literati Award winners for International Journal of Emerging Markets Outstanding Reviewers Leigh Baker Salman Bahoo Alberto Ferraris . Building a relationship with a journal editorial team increases your chances of being invited to join an Editorial Advisory or Review Board. Issue 7 2024. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to My manuscript, which I sumbit to a journal of Sage in September 2022, passed the Editor stage and was taken for peer review. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". Emerald is unable to publish your paper with permissions outstanding. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). We have everything to help you become a more established reviewer. Over several decades many ranking techniques have been proposed as aids to journal selection by libraries. For the first 10 days, it was reviewed by the managing editor and sent to us for some format issues, etc. , 2013). Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, What does awaiting reviewers reply mean? And how long does it take. Some editorial systems give the I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. To do this via the system: Want to involve a junior colleague in the review? [Journal name] supports peer review mentoring and accepts reviews from students and junior researchers. If the editor decides to decline the manuscript, either before or after peer review, they may offer to transfer it to a more relevant Emerald journal in the same field. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. Each paper is first reviewed by the editor and, if it is judged suitable for the journal, it is then sent Select Reviewers Queue. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ Skip to main content. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted 1. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted I recently submitted my paper to a journal 40-45 days back. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a manuscript to a journal using scholarone manuscript system, and later got a decision of major revision. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and They may have reached out to potential reviewers and may be awaiting a response. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. However, I definitely remember the last two: Improve the chances of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. The purpose of this study is to construct and test a new measure of auditor orientation using two audit quality-related tasks. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received They select the peer reviewers. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the The status of my submission changed from Admin: Not Assigned to EA: [name] plus Awaiting ED assignment plus Awaiting CE decision at Scholarone manuscripts. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Is it possible that the journal didn't find reviewers, hence rejected the paper? The rejection For most journals, when we submit revised manuscript, the status automatically updates to 'awaiting reviewer scores' since revised files are mostly sent back to reviewers to ensure that suggested The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept or reject it – or else with a request for revision (usually flagged as either major or minor) before it is reconsidered. Emerging markets or economies or countries include countries classified as “low-income” and “lower-middle-income” based on GNI per capita (World Bank, 2019). For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD , HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY, ENGLAND, W YORKSHIRE, BD16 1WA Metrics. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. Does anybody explain why the journal editor needs to select new reviewers at this step of I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. What is meant by ''Awaiting AE evaluation''? I submitted a paper to the journal. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Should you decline this invitation but wish to suggest a junior colleague to review the paper, type ‘Early Career I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. Economist c7b7. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. If the reviewers agree, they provide their comments to the editorial team and the paper is then returned to the author with a decision and editorial and reviewer comments. Is this normal? It should be easy to send the paper to the previous referees. Post Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same After submitting for the revisions, my paper was selected by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) for the Emerald Publishing journal, Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences (JHASS). Visit Stack Exchange. Awaiting reviewer selection EMERALD. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. After 11 months, the referee evaluation was finalised. Now, an editorial management has to somehow summarise that you are waiting for this step. I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. 2 years - 1 post Thread: 0 Goods vs 0 No Goods; Home » Economics » Research / Journals. In general, in the context of the process of publishing in scientific journals, the phrase “wait for the results of the review after review” refers to the period it takes for the research to be I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the manuscript to another journal”. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. 8. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. It has been three weeks since. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Can someone please let me know what they actually mean? Thank you very much in advance! It means nothing. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal (SEAMJ) is the peer-reviewed publication of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Universiti Brunei Darussalam. Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. Receiving the first decision I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. Should I email the editor or continue waiting? I don't want to piss off the editor and lower my chances of final acceptance. : Review process. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. These status should not be taken seriously. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". Table of contents Multimaterial powder bed fusion techniques Mehrshad AE stands for Associate Editor. However, on the same day, the I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. All issues; EarlyCite; Volume 127 . But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Category Quartile Rank; Engineering - Architecture Q1 #5/189 Engineering - Building and Construction Q1 #28/223 Engineering - General Business, Management and Accounting Q1 #30/218 Engineering - Civil Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal: Volume 15 Issue 1. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. ’ This must be a journal-specific descriptor for the AE You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Now, the status is 'Awaiting EiC Decision. Issue 13 2025 Open Access Issue in Progress. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Among its functions, Journal Assistant provides formatted, up-to-moment reports about manuscripts in need of review, the identification of editorial board members available to review, the names of tardy reviewers that need reminders, and the manuscripts that have completed reviews and require subsequent processing. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same You'll see this status at the start and end of the review cycle. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, As a thank you for your contributions to the journal, you are entitled to free personal access to up 40 Emerald journal articles (excluding backfiles) on Emerald Insight. HTML. Landrum, Christine Farias, Isabella Krysa. Does this mean it has crossed desk reject 2 years ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 1 NO GOOD! Reply . We appreciate the voluntary contribution that each reviewer gives the Journal. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. The review process may take place pre- or post-publication, and reports may Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Does mean desk rejection cleared ? 2 years If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Loading Tour Regularly select reviewers from outside of Sage Track and add them to the database. We are very grateful for the contributions made. An emerging market (or an emerging country or an emerging economy) may be classified as a market under transition from lower-middle-income to upper-middle-income (Bruton et al. 2 I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. But there is still no response. Volume 39 . Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed At Emerald, we believe that fair and equitable peer review, and being inclusive to everyone are important aspects of the peer review process. Table of contents Explorations in organized hypocrisy and a proposed direction for a sustainable future Gerard Farias, Nancy E. The latter is a clear term that means reviewers have agreed to review the article, but have not provided a report yet. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. If you haven’t chosen gold open access and you receive an email that appears to be from Emerald, the journal, or a third party, asking you for payment to publish, please contact our support team via [email protected]. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. A sudden I want to know the factors reputable publishing outfits like Elsevier, Sage, Springer, Wiley, Inderscience and Emerald consider before hosting a journal. under review basically means that your manuscript is still with the handling editor and is being reviewed if instructions were followed, thus fit enough to be sent to blind reviewers. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, 25 days ago, i submitted a paper to a high-profile journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. This paper Managerial Auditing Journal available volumes and issues. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working Skip to main content. This ensures that we receive as wide a mix of views on the manuscript as possible. Several of our journals also employ a panel of reviewers who have agreed to review a pre-specified number of manuscripts per year. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript, like Awaiting Reviewer Invitation, or it's different, and the reviewing Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point I submitted a research paper to a journal. See all 'how to' guides I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. There are three main methods of ranking: citation analysis, use or user judgement, and size or ‘productivity’. Find out more about how to review, and how to become a reviewer. Our principles; Inclusive language; Becoming a peer reviewer for journals; Best practice for reviewers; Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Sociologist 95d. Bookstore; About Emerald. What does this status mean? Thanks in advance. You will find If you’re reviewing a book, journal or article, and you’re looking for support including practical tips and guidance, take a look at our reviewer guides. Managerial Auditing Journal Issue(s) available: 291 – From Volume: 1 Issue: 1, to Volume: 40 Issue: 1. This could be because potential peer reviewers Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. Publish with us Advanced search. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week I recently submitted a manuscript to a peer-reviewed journal. It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Still, this had never happened to me and I This person is an in-house editor, therefore, a guest editor is not required. Contact us; Our awards; Our leadership team; Work with us; Sitemap; Our services. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following, for their invaluable service as 2021 reviewers for this journal. So, why has it returned to Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. The Some Emerald journals have also been experimenting with an article transfer, or cascading, service. One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for For insights into journal decision-making after peer review and to improve your chances of acceptance, you may go through the following resources: Peer review process and editorial decision making at journals; Most common reasons for journal rejection; Tips to avoid journal rejection; Hope that helps. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. This is just one of the many benefits of becoming a reviewer – more details about Emerald reviewer benefits are available I submitted my paper in January. CiteScore Ranking. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit in someone's queue for a few days or even over a week. PDF (223 KB) Downloads. My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. Skip to main content. You can also sign up to the Web of Science Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. If the author accepts that offer, any reviews that have already taken place It's not necessarily the same as 'under review' and 'awaiting reviewer scores'. Now I want to submit my manuscript to another journal, but it would be a duplicate submission in this situation. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. All issues; EarlyCite; Volume 40 . Journals; Join; Log In; 2 years - 1 post - RSS; OP: 2 Goods vs 1 No Goods ; Thread: 2 Goods vs 1 No Goods; Sociology Job Market Rumors » Sociology » Research / Journals. The fact that you are apparently seeing this status for more than a brief moment indicates that the journal is using it as a substitute for "Editor I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. Journal Assistant™ can automatically generate e Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ This status is known by different names with different journals, including ‘Under review’ and ‘Awaiting technical scores. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. Issue 1 2025. Purpose. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months. How long do I need to wait to get the result? Thanks! Please note that Emerald requires you to clear permission to re-use any material not created by you. 208 Are out-of-period adjustments a The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Emerald Insight . Innovation goes beyond creation, concentrating on enhancement, which is essential for advancement. ' I have heard from seniors that the EiC is only consulted for making acceptance-related decisions and that the AE gives [makes] other decisions. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. On most of the Society’s journals, reviewers are selected on an ad hoc basis and may have no connection with either the journal or the Society. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. Subject: RSS feed. Introduction. Summary: This study proposes a dynamic target tracking framework for UGVs based on target state estimation, trajectory prediction, and UGV control to address the challenge of mobile drone recovery under random disturbances. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the Further information. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control; Review of Economic Dynamics; Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control ; Journal of Urban Economics; Join; Log In; ×. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. The journal says on . I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. It has been 1. The submission is now with the author. ” I am so curious (and also frustrated) about the review process, and the following slide meets my curiosity perfectly – it will tell you how Associate Editors work. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Further information. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review Further information. Awaiting reviewers selection emerald. The journal is the only one who's able to solve your problem. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. Subjects: RSS feed. For most articles, a Yes, Indeed mine is undergoing the same process as we speak. Issue 2 2025. This access is valid for a 90-day period from when you receive your access notification. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. If the journal never replies regardless of who you contact, then you'll have to assume the journal is dead, withdraw your manuscript, and submit elsewhere. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). However, as you I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. However, the AE can I have submitted two articles to a journal. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to Q: What does the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores' without assigning GE mean? A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Table of contents Measuring novice auditor orientation and its impact on judgment Ferdy van Beest, Robert Pinsker. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. A few days ago, the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. Related reading: Does a status change from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting editor decision" imply rejection? Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. I know the next stage is to Editor In My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Skip to main content . This access is valid for a 90 day period from when you receive your access The status also means that the paper has been sent to the minimal number of peer reviewers required by the journal (it being 2-3 for most journals). I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. ’ What does this mean? What are the next steps of publication? I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. For now, you only need to wait. Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. The status of the paper changed several times. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' Introducing the China Agricultural Economic Review. How can I become a reviewer for a journal? Please contact the editor for the journal, with a copy of your CV. If you do not hear back from the journal after a few more weeks, you can follow up about the status of your manuscript. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. All the best for whatever is next!. Another possibility is that the editor initially decided to send the manuscript for peer review, but then I resubmitted a paper to a top field journal 3 months ago. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. The I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. The reviewers are contacted and invited to review the manuscript. ’ What this means is that your manuscript has been sent for Social media and the bottom of the pyramid: a systematic literature review and future research agenda Jitender Kumar, Archit Vinod Tapar, Somraj Bhattacharjee. Footer. Find out more about our principles and access our guides to help ensure the peer review process is fair, efficient, and effective. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. Review Settings . Open Access? All of our subscription journals give you Further information. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Journal Evaluates the Reviews The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. Regards, Cite. I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. The former is a vague term that could mean anything: reviewer has been invited, reviewer has agreed to review, maybe even reviewer has submitted a review but there're other reviewers Emerald journal’s peer review process should be the same in practice as is stated on the respective author guidelines, i. lhauhn apl gqor hdpro jwuec dcaju drk inysop rpu lkiyxtnc